employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Lawrence Berkeley Lab

Is this your company?

Okay - not great, not bad - Office of Chief Financial Officer Lawrence Berkeley Lab Employee Review

3.0
Jun 20, 2013
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

-Work-life balance is excellent. -Nice number of holidays and vacation time -Lots of interesting and important research comes out of LBNL -Decent job security as long as you are not a total slacker

Cons

This place is run by scientists with little to no background experience in running or managing a business. This could be good or bad depending on what you do. If you are doing research, that's probably a plus for you. But as a Business/Finance professional that means there are not many opportunities to grow here. Functions in the Office of the CFO are treated by lab management as administrative annoyances - hindrances to research - rather than functions that can add value to the organization. The lab produces science, not profits, so the relative importance of Finance is diminished. To make things more difficult, because the lab is government funded, there are layers of red-tape and paperwork required of the CFO staff that makes what should be simple tasks unnecessary complicated. Researchers here don't understand these burdens and therefore just assume the CFO staff is incompetent - which is not the case. This leads to mistrust and mutual frustration. In short, if you are in a Business/Finance/Operations type function, and are looking to build a career, this is probably not the place for you. Stick to the corporate world. If you are in a later stage of your career and looking to coast into retirement, this place is probably a pretty good option.

Explore other reviews about Lawrence Berkeley Lab

5.0
Jun 22, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Very scientific environment and collaborative

Cons

sometimes things move slow than expected

5.0
Jun 21, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Opportunity to work on impactful scientific and engineering projects that support research and innovation. Exposure to multidisciplinary teams, including engineers, scientists, technicians, and project managers. Strong focus on safety, quality, and technical excellence. Good work-life balance and professional development opportunities. Ability to contribute to long-term projects with significant national and scientific importance.

Cons

Large organizations can have multiple layers of review and approval, which may slow decision-making. Processes and documentation requirements can be extensive, especially for safety and compliance purposes. Project priorities can shift based on funding and organizational needs, requiring flexibility and adaptability.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All