AUTO1 Group reviews

3.1

44% would recommend to a friend

(489 total reviews)
avatar

Christian Bertermann and Hakan Koç

50% approve of CEO

42% positive business outlook

AUTO1 Group has an employee rating of 3.1 out of 5 stars, based on 489 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The AUTO1 Group employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Commerce de détail et de gros industry (3.5 stars).

Reviews by job title

489 reviews
1.0
Nov 9, 2016

Worst company ever

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- You never cry alone in Auto1. There will always be some other employee to whom the company is doing bulling/mobbing/ignoring/laughing at, so you won't be alone.

Cons

- They laugh at employees or managers in front of everybody. - Bad atmosphere. - The workers are very fed up (understandable!), so you hear a lot of complaining all the time. - The communication is non-existing. They don't know what it means. - As they don't care at all for their employees, they won't even know if they have tasks to do or not. - They will not listen to any proposal to get better. No. They are already the best. - Employees have no place to eat and if they eat at their seats they will be screamed out because they should not take a break and talk there.

avatar
AUTO1 Group Response
9y
Dear former colleague, thanks for your feedback. We really appreciate honest feedback and take this seriously. Our company has been growing a lot in the past and we are aware of the fact that some things are not as perfect as we expect them to be. Thus, we are working on measures to improve information flow and communication by, for example, introducing employee newsletters that will be sent on a regular basis. At the same time, we also encourage employees to approach us or the management team directly in case there is a lack of information. I also offer you as well as all other (former/existing) colleagues to contact me directly (eva.kreibohm@auto1.com) to discuss ideas going forward. Kind regards, Eva (Head of HR)
1.0
Mar 1, 2016

Interesting Project but overworking a requirement

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Friendly devs/qa/leads Open to new tools, processes, and ideas Free drinks, fruit, and friday beer Free german classes Friendly and helpful HR If you can tolerate the cons, I imagine career prospects are good

Cons

Significant overtime without warning or appreciation. I am a 9-5 type person, but have happily tolerated 9-5.30 in past employment or even later occasionally - preferably with warning. What I can't tolerate is receiving a lot of pressure to stay in until 8/9/10 with zero warning - which means you have to constantly flake out on friends and can't reliably make evening plans during the week. A sip of champaign after a successful delivery doesn't make up for that, and is one of the reasons I left that job. Some ethical questions may be asked about minor elements of the product I could list two minor things here but won't - anyway, Google to see their customer reviews - they aren't all positive. Senior management handle some incidents poorly and treat staff more like children than employees - unprofessional behaviours. I had to console some fellow staff who were involved in this. I was a shoulder for 2 or 3 others to lean on - tears, complaints, venting. I had a major issue with my manager, which I could tell many others did too but everyone just put up with it. "Toxic boss" is the term, overly-dominating body language, de-moralising the team, taking credit, making an example of those who appeared to question his poorly-earned "power".. And also, pressure to work late. I don't understand how the company turned a blind eye to this individual, perhaps he had the right friends - or was a master manipulator. The main reason I left my job. The company seems to have a strategy of push your employees to their limit (burnout) and then just get new ones in to replace them. When I questioned the overtime to my manager, my team dedication came into question. I worked very hard in that team and the devs told me that - but the manager brought into question whether I was committed to it. There's a difference between being committed - and being willing to put up with totally unreasonable overtime expectations. When I handed in my notice, HR and senior management wished me well and thanked me. My manager instead told me I was making a bad decision, that the sector I was going into had no growth, the increase in pay I would receive wouldn't be as great as I expected, etc. He'll pretty much use any trick in the book to manipulate. I didn't notice a thank you or a good luck, or even a hand shake from my manager as I left the office for the last time.

1.0
Oct 6, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

-Extremely fast paced - new (poorly developed) features can go out within days or weeks, instead of months like in other companies. -Even if the above can be treated as pro, I can’t think of any other advantages of joining this company.

Cons

-Top down approach brought to the extreme - the company operates purely on the whims of the CEO and a few VPs. There are quarterly product roadmap planning sessions that every time end up with the entire plan being tossed into the garbage. This is very demotivating as you start feeling like anything you’re doing is worthless. -Addressing employees in a disrespectful manner by some of the top management - there is a serious company culture issue where it is allowed to berate employees and address them in a disrespectful manner without any consequences. Even when other management members acknowledge the behavior is improper, nothing is done about it. This creates an extremely stressful and toxic work environment that leaves you doubting your own self worth and skills. -Lack of delegation and trust in employees - every decision needs to be taken by the top management, including the colors of buttons and placement of page elements. There is zero trust in employees. Even if the decision taking process has been supposedly delegated, the decisions taken continue to be overridden without any sound reason causing chaos and delays. Most importantly it causes decision paralysis among the employees. -Extremely chaotic management - the weekly pipeline calls cause weekly change of priorities. Pretty much every week you and your team need to drop anything you’ve been doing to adjust to the new “wonderful” idea the top management came up with. There is little to no communication about the reasons and goals, you need to trust that they know what is right and what is wrong. -Multiple communication channels, product management tools - due to poorly conceptualized “savings” the company operates within multiple different internal communication platforms, causing chaos in feedback and approval processes. You never know where something has been discussed, where a decision has been taken and you waste time on trying to put everything together. -Trying to be data driven without proper tools or staffing - I need to give to to A1 that it collects an extreme amount of data and there is an overall direction to be more data driven. However the raw data can’t be easily processed, understood and visualized as tools are missing for the purpose. You need to be an SQL expert yourself if you want to understand anything happening in the product as the BA and data teams are very understaffed. The company relies on spreadsheets to a level not seen anywhere else. The management keeps questioning the results and rejecting the reports presented from the data if it doesn’t fit their overall vision. -Tech debt dating to the first day of the company’s existence - all the product teams need to always work on something new, there can’t be any time “wasted” on bringing on improvements or fixing the tech debt. Even introducing fixes to bugs that are known to cause loss and returns require a painful justification and approval process. -Chaotic and/or lacking documentation - There is no process in place to ensure that all of the product and technical documentation is properly captured and stored in an organized hierarchical level. You need to play an archeologist and dig through different places to understand any existing feature in case you need to bring any changes or troubleshoot any issues. -Systems holding it together with cable ties and duct tape - because of the above the MVPs that have proven to be successful can never be properly expanded, leaving in place processes that overly rely on emails, spreadsheets and cheap offshore labor. This leads to huge amounts of human errors as well as system level issues that require painstaking troubleshooting to find the cause of erratic behavior. -Domain experts being the only source of knowledge - because of the issues piling up in the system from all of the never finished MVP’s you spend half of your day on responding to complaints and bug reports, however your only way of finding out why the system worked in the way it did is to ask any remaining domain experts and QA to test and try to recreate the issue in the QA env. This has an impact on the timelines of new features you need to deliver. Also as more domain experts are leaving you’re often left without anyone knowing what is really happening. Be prepared to spend half of your time providing support rather than doing any product work. - You can never be sure that you know the product well - The initial onboarding only allows you to understand the very tip of an iceberg of what is happening in the product. Your onboarding is never complete and even if you’ve consulted half the company before completing your product specs, you can never be sure that something hasn’t been omitted.

Viewing 16 - 18 of 489 Reviews

Glassdoor has 998 AUTO1 Group reviews submitted anonymously by AUTO1 Group employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if AUTO1 Group is right for you.