Thomson Reuters reviews

3.9

74% would recommend to a friend

(14,567 total reviews)
avatar

Steve Hasker

82% approve of CEO

66% positive business outlook

Thomson Reuters has an employee rating of 3.9 out of 5 stars, based on 14,567 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Thomson Reuters employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Informatique industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

15K reviews
2.0
Apr 27, 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Flexibility, interesting work, nice campus, decent benefits

Cons

Low pay for demanding job in terms of productivity requirements and skills required, crippling silo, frequent shifts in strategy and layoffs/outsourcing, no real opportunity to advance - only lateral moves are likely, and oftentimes they would be demotions in terms of pay grade.

3.0
Aug 5, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Back in the 1990's and early 2000's then Reuters used to be a great place to work, that's not the case now (see cons), although I'll agree that there was plenty of fat. You can get to work on some market leading products. For me I get to telecommute a lot. Most offices are physically nice places to be. I get paid pretty well, for most I think that the pay a average or a little better than average.

Cons

About 2004 major cost cutting started with a program called "fast forward", since then much of the pressure to increase returns for investors has been met by cost cutting rather than revenue growth. It is typical to get emails from the CEO that say words to the effect "well done we have grown revenues by 2%, ..... bla bla bla. We are going to cut XYZ". For the past 3 years I've seen cuts about every 6 months. Over the past 10 years it is hard to remember a year in which there were no cutbacks. In 10 years the IT department started off in-house then it was outsourced to IBM, then Fujitsi, then brought in house, now being outsourced again. There are the typical/stupid frustrations of we have budget for X but not for Y. For example no budget to buy descent computers for developers, rather than spend $1000 to upgrade a computer, they will pay someone much more to sit around and do nothing because they are waiting for their under powered out-dated computer. A lot of big company policies. You can choose any two from these, cheap, quick, quality. Cheap and quick is the priority now, quality used to be the priority, but that's no longer the case. Get the software out there and worry about it later appears to be the management motto now. There seems to be a belief that you can swap any team out, so a team that knows a product inside out can all be let got and the product handed over to a team that knows nothing about it; people and teams are not plug-and-play like that. Often a conservative approach to doing things, this does not mean quality it means unnecessarily sticking with old technology, this can be to the point where they are using hardware and software that is a decade beyond it's official end of life, indeed some hardware would more suited to a museum.

avatar
Thomson Reuters Response
10y
Thank you for your review and ongoing valued contribution. There will be challenges to overall improvements and the solution will come from constructive and engaged conversation internally. Along with the efforts in strengthening our core businesses, various senior leadership topics such as midyear progress on strategy and the recent second-quarter company results are covered in “Current News” and can be accessed internally via The Hub. As we continue to strive in all aspects within the market with focus on our customers, we will continue to seek engagement internally with an open mind to bring curiosity, innovation, leadership and empowerment to always seek a better way.
1.0
Apr 11, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The people are great despite living in fear of the possibility of being let go at any moment

Cons

There's an internal saying at TR... "every Thanksgiving you get a turkey and a re-org" which is sadly very true. Employees essentially live in continuous "fear" that they're going to be let go at the end of each year as part of TR's famous "RIF" (reduction in force) process or, worse, a more extensive re-org (This past year we had both). Another sad internal truism, "it's not a matter of IF but when you'll get let go from TR."

Viewing 70 - 72 of 14,567 Reviews

Glassdoor has 18,724 Thomson Reuters reviews submitted anonymously by Thomson Reuters employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Thomson Reuters is right for you.