employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Lockheed Martin

Is this your company?

Lockheed Martin reviews

4.1

83% would recommend to a friend

(14,507 total reviews)
avatar

James D. Taiclet

82% approve of CEO

72% positive business outlook

Lockheed Martin has an employee rating of 4.1 out of 5 stars, based on 14,507 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an excellent working experience there. The Lockheed Martin employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Aérospatiale et défense industry (3.6 stars).

Reviews by job title

15K reviews
4.0
Apr 26, 2011
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great people, challenging work, a lot of flexibility in hours/vacation time, etc. Lots of internal positions to apply to in order to expand your knowledge base.

Cons

Strong 'who you know' network that can hinder promotions. Higher ratings are determined by how much exposure you have had to senior leadership throughout the year. The more visible you are the higher you are rated. Strong cultural discrepancy between Baby Boomers and younger workforce. Healthcare plan has gone down the toilet. Pension plan not available for younger employees = no incentive to stay.

1.0
Jun 7, 2010
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Lockheed is a great name to have on your resume when you're looking for a better job. As far as actually working at Lockheed, it's a huge company doing mostly government contracting, so it's somewhat resistant to economic swings, but there have been layoffs in the last year.

Cons

Most the people in management at the Manassas site are holdovers from before the site was a Lockheed facility. These people are entrenched in their jobs and are resistant to any change. There is an incredibly strong "good ole boys" atmosphere, and it is next to impossible to advance if you're not part of the club, or willing to do some serious brown-nosing. This also leads to a culture of employees being fearful of reporting anything that's unfair, unethical, or worse out of fear of retaliation. Lockheed uses a forced ranking performance assessment process which drops employees into five performance categories, with well over half getting the middle "successful" category. The performance evaluation criteria are intentionally extremely vague so that management can justify giving anybody any assessment. Even with such a wide open system, the managers don't even bother to make it appear that they actually follow the system to evaluate employees. I know from looking at my manager's publicly available Outlook calendar that the managers finished ranking employees in my department last year BEFORE the peer and lead ("multi-raters") input was collected. They didn't even bother to hear what coworkers had to say about us! They just got together, sat in a room, and decided which employees they liked best.

2.0
Apr 4, 2009
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

It is very fast paced, and you will learn a lot in a very short amount of time--if you are not afraid to jump in and get your hands dirty. I highly recommend it as a first job out of college--you'll receive a lot of support in learning the ropes of manufacturing operations and engineering, especially from more senior individual contributors. It'll seem pretty daunting at first, but you'll learn a couple of skills--namely multi-tasking and prioritizing--that will help you throughout the rest of your career. Also, it is a product you can take pride in--very challenging to engineer and manufacture at a competitive rate, yet we do it.

Cons

The creme doesn't necessarily rise to the top. Lockheed Martin is a matrixed organization--meaning the people you report to and perform for on a daily basis (i.e., program managers) aren't the ones determing who gets raises/promotions. That would be functional management, who seem to be in a completely different world. Many of their initiatives look great from their perspective, but end up wasting program budget with no tangible benefit when implemented. Of course, no one actually validates the alleged cost savings after implementation. So go ahead and take credit for something that hasn't happened yet, then move on to your next big project! If you curry management's favor by making these initiatives your priority, you'll move up the ladder; even faster if you have a sponsor in upper management. There are some exceptions, but many of these ladder-climbers don't have the respect of their peers and/or program managers. Maybe it's just this particular site, but the office politics are terrible. Coworkers will throw you under the bus for the slightest mistake, especially when management is looking for a scapegoat. It amazes me that if someone is protected, they can toss out allegation after allegation without any repercussions, no matter how many times the accused are later exonerated. Others will spend more time and effort for a job poorly done, than it would to take to actually do the job right.

Viewing 115 - 117 of 14,507 Reviews

Glassdoor has 16,642 Lockheed Martin reviews submitted anonymously by Lockheed Martin employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Lockheed Martin is right for you.