Kingfisher reviews

3.7

66% would recommend to a friend

(404 total reviews)
avatar

Thierry Garnier

81% approve of CEO

49% positive business outlook

Kingfisher has an employee rating of 3.7 out of 5 stars, based on 404 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Kingfisher employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Commerce de détail et de gros industry (3.5 stars).

Reviews by job title

404 reviews
1.0
Mar 13, 2024

Toxic

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Flexible Work life balance Profitable business model

Cons

There is a toxic culture of bullying and aggression, which is widely accepted. The leadership lack strategic vision and are operationally focused. Few women in middle management and senior leadership cultivates an alpha male culture and multiple gender biases.

3.0
Oct 28, 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great working environment (in office or at home) Great company benefits (pension, share schemes, discount across companies owned) Seemingly endless budget for justifiable projects Great work/life balance (driven further by homeworking with COVID)

Cons

Extremely poor management, large volume of "people" managers in jobs that require technical expertise. A fundamental lack of understanding and lack of proactivity to try to understand has created a pass the buck culture where glaring issues are ignored and sloppy workarounds are used. Management will happily throw money at 3rd party experts who know less than internal employees and who end up taking the company on a ride for many months whilst contributing nothing. New functionality/goals are driven by the city and shareholders who have zero understanding of the impact to existing projects. Unrealistic timelines mean nothing is ever fully completed or done to a high standard. This isn't an issue if people accept poor quality but the shareholders want things to be great quality and also done now. Case and point B&Q's website, so much potential but such a bad customer experience as time is never given and lessons learned are always ignored. Yearly surveys that are ignored. Colleagues are asked yearly to rate all areas of the business, every year the same feedback is given and the same "we will look at how we can resolve this" line is communicated but nothing has ever been done (in 5 years) to change anything. This ties into the next point as there is a group of managers/directors that shield each other from bad feedback ever being escalated. Cronyism - management jobs and senior positions are given to friends/mates of management, not the best candidates available. This is an accepted fact across multiple areas of the business that has lead to apathy in the hardworkers who eventually leave the business and take their knowledge with them. Talent retention is a massive issue for Kingfisher which they're fully aware of but do little to resolve. People smart enough to point out flaws can be labelled as troublemakers rather than listened to (the same people who do a majority of work and are emotionally invested being labelled troublemakers is a very quick way to lose them)

3.0
Oct 23, 2019

Alright company

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Okay salary Some staff are nice If managers like you, you’ll do well

Cons

Stress levels If you do great at your job, you get to do somebody else’s too

Viewing 28 - 30 of 404 Reviews

Glassdoor has 557 Kingfisher reviews submitted anonymously by Kingfisher employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Kingfisher is right for you.