Autonomy, but not much interaction with product and siloed development culture - Software Engineer Criteo Employee Review

3.0
Jul 10, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- A lot of autonomy when it came to releasing software - Good work-life balance - Criteo does an excellent job hiring personable individuals who are a pleasure to work with

Cons

- Product specifications are dropped in the laps of the development teams. No opportunity for development teams to ask questions of the product stakeholders and subject matter experts prior to being expected to build the feature. Often lead to building the wrong thing - Development on your immediate team was often siloed where one or two people may have the background context on what was being built while other team members would not. This made peer reviews and product support difficult. - Acceptance criteria very often times not included for tasks in project management software making it difficult to evaluate if the software is doing what it is supposed to

avatar
Criteo Response
1y
Receiving such detailed feedback always allows us to address our teams' real challenges. We know efficient and transparent cross-team collaboration can be challenging and that is why we hold transparent communication at such a high value. We also know circulating information across teams is a constant area of improvement; that is why it is crucial to get constructive feedback, so we can identify patterns and potential blockers. Thank you again for sharing your thoughts and input; It will help us improve our ways of working in the future.

Explore other reviews about Criteo

5.0
Jun 8, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great environment, great people to work with

Cons

Need to go back to office

avatar
Criteo Response
1w
We're thrilled to receive such positive feedback and to know that you've found a place where you can grow and thrive at Criteo. Thank you for sharing and for your trust all these years. It's great to have you on the team!
2.0
Jan 31, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Smart, hardworking people at the individual contributor level (many of whom are now gone). Little micro-managing, but that’s because everyone’s bandwidth is near 0

Cons

Post–new CEO, the company has descended into complete chaos. There is no transparency around decisions that impact teams and roles. There have been consistent strategy, personnel, and supplier changes with no explanation, accountability, or follow-through. Cons, continued: Employee input and performance do not matter. Decisions feel driven by appeasing BoD and optics rather than results, input and reality. The culture has become a corporate hellscape of: Endless reorganizations with no clear rationale, including layoffs with no reasoning Vague all-hands meetings that avoid real issues, even when directly asked A massive disconnect between the C-suite and day-to-day reality Eroded trust and growing position insecurity Middle managers incentivized to prioritize managing up & executive optics over team advocacy “Return to Office” policy put in place when promised a “Work from Anywhere” position, where the RTO policy differs across employees’ location Little to no growth opportunities despite high performance Under-market average compensation that was justified by locale, “Work from Anywhere”, and flexibility — which was recently rolled back A clear favoritism to those that “talk the talk” vs “performance with numbers”

10
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All