There are no pros of joining Capgemini - Software Engineer Capgemini Employee Review

1.0
Jan 16, 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

There are no pros of joining Capgemini

Cons

1. If you are a fresher I will never recommend to join Capgemini. They will give you exhaustive training for 4-6 months to get deployed in a very average projects which could be handled by 12th pass outs. You will not have any say for selection of technology, they will make you feel like a slave and will definitely try to humiliate you if you try to speak up for yourself even in case of injustice. 2. Management do not have any professionalism when it comes to handling any situation. You will never be praised for any good work and maintaining professionalism , you will have to know how keep your manager happy which involves not asking any questions about shifts or leaves. 3. This company provides only 23 leaves per year and last year I was only able to take 3 leaves in the entire year. 4.The opportunities will be only provided to seniors because good opportunities have become scarce in this company.There are only average projects available which does not do any justice to engineering knowledge. 5. Overall if you are ready to get depressed and waste 2 precious years of starting of your career( as freshers have to sign 2 years pf service bond )then only join this company. 6. Last but not the least they do have any good pay structure and you will end up without getting any raise for years.

Explore other reviews about Capgemini

5.0
Jun 25, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good inclusive culture , supportive community

Cons

You have to be proactive and show above and beyond quality

1.0
Jun 30, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

there are no pros for this company

Cons

I was laid off after spending several months on the bench, with "lack of available projects" cited as the reason. However, another consultant in the same role who was also without an active client engagement was retained. As a woman and racial minority, I could not ignore the disparity in how these decisions appeared to be made. Before my termination, I reported being recorded without my consent and raised concerns about conduct that I believed reflected implicit bias. I was referred to as "URM" instead of by my name or role, encouraged toward race based employee resource groups rather than meaningful career opportunities, and repeatedly advocated for fair project placement while on the bench. My employment ended shortly after I raised these concerns. Following my termination, I pursued the matter through the appropriate internal and legal channels. I provided documentation supporting my concerns and gave the company multiple opportunities to investigate and resolve the issues. Rather than meaningfully addressing the evidence or acknowledging the seriousness of the allegations, the company denied wrongdoing, offered what I viewed as a nominal severance, and declined to accept accountability. Employees deserve confidence that concerns about discrimination and retaliation will be investigated objectively and fairly. My experience left me with the opposite impression.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All