Demoralizing upper management- best thing I did was leave this company - Anonymous employee ADP Employee Review

1.0
Apr 27, 2018
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

* Location * Benefit package is ok * Celebrate wins * Strong onbaording

Cons

* SBS leader in Burnaby - toxic - walking HR violation and no one does anything about it because x has been there for 20 years. * High school environment * Pay is below industry standard * HR turns a blind eye to how upper management treats employees * Worst Micromanagement I've ever experienced * Multiple one on ones - waste of time, takes away from selling * Outdated technology * Extremely high turnover * Heavy favoritism - Employees who are parents/get pregnant are a burden * Success isn't based on numbers and aptitude, but who you can kiss up to

Explore other reviews about ADP

5.0
Jun 19, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Uncapped commission and great freedom

Cons

It’s a grind but worth it

2.0
Jun 15, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Established company with a long history and relatively stable business operations. - Provides a sense of job stability compared to many organizations navigating rapid changes in the current AI-driven market. - Lower risk of frequent restructuring or large-scale layoffs than many high-growth technology companies. - Opportunity to work with experienced employees who have deep institutional and domain knowledge. - Predictable work environment that may appeal to individuals seeking long-term stability over rapid change. - Strong choice for professionals who value job security and a steady career path in an uncertain economic climate.

Cons

- Documentation is limited or rusted, and many operational processes lack clear runbooks or standardized procedures, making onboarding and troubleshooting more difficult than necessary. - If you're coming from a modern, fast-paced engineering environment, the organization may feel behind current industry practices and tooling. - Internal politics can sometimes outweigh technical merit or execution. - There are teams with very long-tenured employees where change and innovation can be difficult to drive. - Decision-making often involves multiple layers of approval, resulting in significant bureaucracy and slower execution. - Processes can move slowly, and collaboration is not always transparent across teams, leading to inefficiencies and occasional confusion around ownership. - In some areas, roles, responsibilities, and operational processes are not clearly defined, creating unnecessary chaos and inconsistent ways of working. - Engineering standards and best practices vary considerably between teams, making cross-team collaboration challenging. - Organizational change tends to happen slowly, which can be frustrating for employees who are focused on modernization, automation, and continuous improvement.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All