Dow reviews

3.9

72% would recommend to a friend

(3,449 total reviews)
avatar

Jim Fitterling

62% approve of CEO

41% positive business outlook

Dow has an employee rating of 3.9 out of 5 stars, based on 3,449 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Dow employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Industrie manufacturière industry (3.5 stars).

Reviews by job title

3K reviews
1.0
Dec 8, 2012
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

compensation and benefits are good Plenty opportunities if you luck out with management that supports you movement

Cons

Poor HR Management which allows my managers to fire employees on the basis of their personal feelings. Corporate disconnected to other sites. Do not live by their own company values. No visibility to Upper management totally disconnected at plant level therefore have no idea of what their assigned plant manager are doing locally. Witnessed employees be ostracized reporting mismanagement or HR issues.

1.0
Nov 14, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Colleagues (not leaders) are the best part of Dow. Majority of employees are very nice to work with. Can’t think of any other pros

Cons

The company is headed into wrong direction. The board needs to intervene and purge out incompetent C level executives who have been responsible for driving the stock price from ~60$ to ~20$ in less than a year. The extreme focus on DEI is counter productive - it is costing the company a lot. Promotion freeze and hiring freeze is in place for about a year yet you’ll see higher level directors and fellows get promotions. The policy is not applied to all levels equally. Spending freeze is getting to a ridiculous levels. Workstations haven’t been upgraded for 4+ years. The awards and recognitions have been stopped for over a year. The morale of the workforce is very low. Despite laying off a significant portion of employees, the leaders have unrealistic expectations about the amount of work that needs to be done. The employees have been reduced but the work is still the same if not more. The Dow chemical company from 2022 and from today are not the same. It will probably take years to recover from this position. The company wide surveys for leaders and organization have been discontinued. The flexible work has also been discontinued - the company didn’t fail cause employees had flexibility - the company failed because the leadership has been a disaster. This company needs a fresh start and purging of current C level execs. If you have an offer from Dow, please reconsider it. There’s no growth or promotions for at least 3-4 years.

2.0
Jun 25, 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

For a young-ish PhD in Core R&D, a position in Core R&D's synthesis/catalysis/polymers group (has been called OPO, IMHC, Chem Sci, amongst other things) is an ok job on average, but not great. I will try to briefly summarize the pros and cons. Overall, I am slightly disappointed in Dow's Core R&D; it has potential to be much more than it is, but the potential is lost due to standard corporate America problems. Therefore, it's a great back-up plan (e.g. you can't find anything better): -excellent starting offer (pay) -interesting industrial problems to solve -Dow has been around a long time, and has systems for everything. They are already established, and so not that much time needs to be wasted if you trust in the system (this is also a con) -Dow is good about supporting minorities and groups such as LGBTQ

Cons

-Dow epic-ly fails at co-aligning employee performance with employee rewards (pay raises). The people that rise to the top are always those that play the game the best. Technical performance is 'rewarded', but often the spotlight is stolen by someone else. These sorts of thing are common in corporate america; Dow is on the worse end of it. -Core R&D is not the best place to be right now (recently chopped pretty heavily), and based on trends in the chemical industry, it doesn't look good for the future. The degree to which Dow's businesses value Core R&D varies, but there historically have been complaints. -Midland sucks. It's a good place to live if you want to raise a family, but other than that there isn't much going on in any regards. -although Dow has a good culture in terms of accepting different races/genders/etc..., it has a very narrow personality type. Everyone at Dow is Type A, and Dow employees struggle heavily with doing anything differently than they used to. Dow really struggles with non-conventional solutions and thinking outside of the box. -High-level management change every year or two really undermines overall group performance. -mid-level management (e.g. most people's managers) are usually some combination of ineffectual, impotent, or uncaring. On average I've had a new manager every ~10 months, and not a single one really helped my career much. Some were well intentioned, but constrained by 'rules'. Some didn't care. etc... -When you factor all of these things together, could think that Dow would struggle with talent retention (e.g. keeping high performers versus people who play the game well). This is a well known problem at Dow. It is very common for people to getting industrial training at Dow and then go off to another company where they are more highly valued.

Viewing 25 - 27 of 3,449 Reviews

Glassdoor has 5,192 Dow reviews submitted anonymously by Dow employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Dow is right for you.