Meta reviews

3.6

55% would recommend to a friend

(18,021 total reviews)
avatar

Mark Zuckerberg

44% approve of CEO

53% positive business outlook

Meta has an employee rating of 3.6 out of 5 stars, based on 18,021 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Meta employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Informatique industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

18K reviews
3.0
Jun 30, 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

1) Ownership of software 2) Responsibilities are given 3) No lack of projects 4) Compensation and package is awesome

Cons

1) Pressure tends to be high 2) long working hours 3) Management is ineffective 4) Managers sometimes aren't very understanding 5) A lot of employees have the fear of getting fired for performance

2.0
Apr 26, 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Facebook is used by everyone, and this is incredible. The Menlo Park campus is really cool and has a great vibe. - Great benefits - Smart people - Impact on millions of people

Cons

I joined Facebook a few years ago because of the agility of the engineering team. Back then, it was true. Today, not as much. - Most projects fail due to over-complication and over-engineering - Smart people are hampered by large inflexible codebase - Very hype-based culture (thing x is the new hotness, everyone on board!) - Most of the code is old and not owned by anyone, yet still in production - Most work is very mundane and not very exciting

1.0
Nov 15, 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The pay; challenging and opportunity to learn a lot.

Cons

I was never able to get a complete sense as to if it was common throughout the org, but my team was an absolute meat-grinder situation. Summary: - From the git-go, there wasn't even honesty about the job description, or even title, during the job interview. On my second day I learned that the position had a different name and dept than what I had been told. - There was absolutely no training for a highly complex role. We were just told to read the wikis. Except that a lot of things didn't exist in the wikis and you just had to go at it and hope it worked, and that any mistakes wouldn't set your projects back too much. - Despite the above, there was absolutely no leniency for taking a bit longer on your first projects. You were held to the same timelines as other team members that had been there months or years. - You were also held to the same timelines despite rapid changes being implemented to the system that caused weeks-long delays (e.g. longer review processes.) Somehow you were just supposed to compensate for them. - Expectations were not made clear at all - you didn't know you were failing at something until you were being told you could loose your job. - Rabid management that provided no support to you. The only purpose of my weekly meeting with my team lead was to be reminded that I could loose my job if I didn't produce enough. The manager would routinely flip out during team meetings and put a team members' position in question - in front of the entire team - for the smallest of mistakes. It was one of the most hostile work environments I've ever experienced. I literally ended up coaching multiple team members on how they too could leave their roles during my last week.

Viewing 157 - 159 of 18,021 Reviews

Glassdoor has 24,143 Meta reviews submitted anonymously by Meta employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Meta is right for you.