Not the best, but not bad - Software Developer Natixis Employee Review

3.0
Jan 8, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good offices with good conditions, good community and events.

Cons

Some projects can be hard to work on duo to lack of evolution and knowledge retention. Too much demand for the amount of developers in some teams. Caught myself trying to not unlearn what I've learned in previous experiences and had to make double the effort to keep myself up to date in terms of technology because the work was focused only in maintaining the app and not evolving it.

avatar
Natixis Response
1y
Thank you for taking the time out to share your experience with us. We value your thoughts and ideas to create a better environment within our company. It would have been very helpful if you have discussed your perspective and suggestions with HR and/or your manager before leaving the company. Natixis wishes you all the best in your new challenges.

Explore other reviews about Natixis

5.0
May 22, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good company culture and benefits

Cons

No cons to note yet

1.0
May 11, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

A lot of easy transportation options.

Cons

I'll be direct: Natixis CIB's management has a serious disconnect from market reality, and a recent job posting ("IT compliance and finance manager") is a perfect example of it. They are advertising an L1 IT management role — a squad lead position — with a requirement list that would challenge a senior director at a top-tier bank. Python, SQL, Informatica, Business Objects, Power BI, Easymorph, Sybase, CI/CD, Agile, data modeling, requirements gathering, budget management, Steerco presentations, compliance oversight, and direct people management — all in one role, all expected simultaneously. The compensation attached to this does not come close to reflecting that scope. Not even close. This isn't an isolated posting. It reflects how Natixis routinely structures roles: overload the job description, underpay the hire, and then use performance management as a pressure valve when the person — predictably — can't do everything. I have personally seen talented, experienced managers placed into roles like this and then PIPs'd out when they couldn't deliver the impossible. The PIP process here is not a development tool. It is an exit mechanism dressed up in HR language. Leadership operates in a top-down, Paris-driven model that is slow to change and resistant to accountability. Decisions that should take days take months. Technology choices lag the industry by years — the tools listed in this posting (Informatica, Business Objects, Easymorph) tell you everything you need to know about the modernization roadmap. If you are a strong IT manager with real skills and real options, do not take this role at the pay they are offering. You will be stretched thin, undervalued, and held accountable for systemic failures that predate you. The market will pay you significantly more for less frustration.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All