Natixis in Porto is a great company that offers ample opportunities for professional growth. - Senior QA Engineer Natixis Employee Review

4.0
Aug 19, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Over my five years at Natixis, I had the opportunity to work on several interesting projects, including those in health insurance and B2B banking. These experiences allowed me to gain valuable expertise across various banking products, enriching my skill set and knowledge.

Cons

However, there were some challenges. Managers can be slow to respond at times, and decisions regarding employee benefits or extras can take a considerable amount of time to be finalized.

avatar
Natixis Response
1y
Thank you for taking the time out to share your experience with us. It is a pleasure to hear that you are appreciating your journey and making an impact! Our commitment is to foster a pleasant work environment for our employees and we want to thank you for being part of it!

Explore other reviews about Natixis

5.0
Jun 24, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Nice people Work life balance

Cons

None everything is great !

1.0
May 11, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

A lot of easy transportation options.

Cons

I'll be direct: Natixis CIB's management has a serious disconnect from market reality, and a recent job posting ("IT compliance and finance manager") is a perfect example of it. They are advertising an L1 IT management role — a squad lead position — with a requirement list that would challenge a senior director at a top-tier bank. Python, SQL, Informatica, Business Objects, Power BI, Easymorph, Sybase, CI/CD, Agile, data modeling, requirements gathering, budget management, Steerco presentations, compliance oversight, and direct people management — all in one role, all expected simultaneously. The compensation attached to this does not come close to reflecting that scope. Not even close. This isn't an isolated posting. It reflects how Natixis routinely structures roles: overload the job description, underpay the hire, and then use performance management as a pressure valve when the person — predictably — can't do everything. I have personally seen talented, experienced managers placed into roles like this and then PIPs'd out when they couldn't deliver the impossible. The PIP process here is not a development tool. It is an exit mechanism dressed up in HR language. Leadership operates in a top-down, Paris-driven model that is slow to change and resistant to accountability. Decisions that should take days take months. Technology choices lag the industry by years — the tools listed in this posting (Informatica, Business Objects, Easymorph) tell you everything you need to know about the modernization roadmap. If you are a strong IT manager with real skills and real options, do not take this role at the pay they are offering. You will be stretched thin, undervalued, and held accountable for systemic failures that predate you. The market will pay you significantly more for less frustration.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All