There was nothing to do - Software Consultant CGI Employee Review

3.0
May 9, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- The people are kind and friendly, particularly my line manager. - Think there was a good pension but I don't remember what, exactly. - Share scheme. If you spend 3% of your salary on shares through salary sacrifice, CGI will match this. And if you wanted, you could just sell those shares immediately, gaining 3%.

Cons

- Nothing to do. I had 2 job offers. At my previous employer, I had the same problem and was made redundant which I found incredibly stressful. I chose CGI because they convinced me this wouldn't happen here. I was told I'd be working for a client in roughly 2 weeks after starting. 3 months later, I still had no client, so I resigned after only 3 months and went to work for the company I had turned down 3 months earlier. Feel like I was lied to by the recruiter who told me I'd have work within 2 weeks. I was told by my manager that the recruiter should not have told me this. - The job board. Most consultancies that I have worked for will arrange a client for you. At CGI, you have to go onto a job board and apply for those jobs yourself. If you are without a job for a long time, you become at risk of redundancy. However I was told there are ways around this (e.g. if you are coming to the end of that time period, you can sign up for a certification training and that resets the clock). For me, this defeats the purpose of working for a consultancy. I may as well apply for these jobs myself outside of CGI and be paid more as a consultant.

Explore other reviews about CGI

5.0
Jun 18, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Work life balance, growth, quality

Cons

Less pay compared to market

1.0
Jun 16, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

no specific positives to highlight from my perspective

Cons

I worked at CGI in both India and the USA and observed similar workplace culture concerns across both locations. The only real difference was HR—India HR felt more supportive, while my experience with USA HR was disappointing. My employment ended shortly after maternity leave due to an alleged “lack of projects,” which I experienced as a layoff. I also observed what appeared to be misuse of position by some leaders, including blurred professional boundaries, preferential treatment, and expectations that went beyond normal workplace roles—at times resembling personal-assistant-style demands rather than professional conduct. Surprisingly, I also noticed inconsistent “policies” applied differently to different individuals. In some cases, it felt like the rules changed depending on who you were. When leadership became aware that someone was related to another employee in the organization, it sometimes felt like that person was singled out or targeted rather than treated objectively. Overall, these practices—whether through inconsistent treatment, perceived power misuse, or favoritism—undermine trust, damage workplace culture, and raise serious concerns about fairness and professionalism.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All