Poor management - Senior Software Developer CGI Employee Review

1.0
Feb 13, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Compared to other service providing companies that I have worked with, i cant seem to recollect any special pro to list here

Cons

- Management is built with friends and family circle rather than based on eligibility and capability. - No respect for developers. Open humiliation in the office and in front of clients. - No humanity, empathy or any kind of emotional sentiment for employees. Employees are reprimanded even with severe health issues and are forced to work beyond 10-12 hours with no overtime. This has caused a lot of employees to have come out of this company with anxiety disorder, panic attacks and heart conditions. - Managers do not know the definition of their role and hence are unaware of their roles and responsibilities and they consider the designation of Manager as owning employees as slaves. - No backbone or decision making skills. Lacking basic IT 101 knowledge also do not help any further. - No monitory or skill growth. Still work on outdated technology and no learning growth on recent technology. Most of the projects are still being worked on Angular 2 - No diversity or inclusivity. - 0 work life balance

Explore other reviews about CGI

5.0
Dec 5, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Growth, salary, learning material, freedom to plan your day

Cons

Could use better training guides for new employees

1.0
Jun 16, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

no specific positives to highlight from my perspective

Cons

I worked at CGI in both India and the USA and observed similar workplace culture concerns across both locations. The only real difference was HR—India HR felt more supportive, while my experience with USA HR was disappointing. My employment ended shortly after maternity leave due to an alleged “lack of projects,” which I experienced as a layoff. I also observed what appeared to be misuse of position by some leaders, including blurred professional boundaries, preferential treatment, and expectations that went beyond normal workplace roles—at times resembling personal-assistant-style demands rather than professional conduct. Surprisingly, I also noticed inconsistent “policies” applied differently to different individuals. In some cases, it felt like the rules changed depending on who you were. When leadership became aware that someone was related to another employee in the organization, it sometimes felt like that person was singled out or targeted rather than treated objectively. Overall, these practices—whether through inconsistent treatment, perceived power misuse, or favoritism—undermine trust, damage workplace culture, and raise serious concerns about fairness and professionalism.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All