Clearly violating public policy on discrimination, hostile workplace, and constructive dismissal - Anonymous employee CGI Employee Review

1.0
Dec 4, 2018
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Some good people, co-workers. Hearts are in the right place. Note: THESE ARE MY OPINIONS, and not evidence of FACTS, those you'll have to find out on your own. Management's memories of these events described here may be different than my own.

Cons

Note: THESE ARE MY OPINIONS and Observations, and not evidence of FACTS, those you'll have to find out on your own. Basic ethics violations over looked. Management promoted based on tech skills and not because they can actually lead people. They take great pride in their 'internal message about inclusive caring for all stakeholders, stockholders, employees, customers' , but they are too willing to leave out employees. There is NO transparency, latest re-orgs were done in secret, and didn't involve effected 'employees' at all. Request 1:1 with management, good luck with that. No real open door policies. Federal contracting business is also slowing down. Management's take and memories of these events described here may be different than my own. These are my memories. Sorry for the disclaimers, but I'd rather not face their deep legal pockets.

Explore other reviews about CGI

5.0
May 27, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good work environment Strong leadership

Cons

Room for growth can be limited unless you really seek it out.

1.0
Jun 16, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

no specific positives to highlight from my perspective

Cons

I worked at CGI in both India and the USA and observed similar workplace culture concerns across both locations. The only real difference was HR—India HR felt more supportive, while my experience with USA HR was disappointing. My employment ended shortly after maternity leave due to an alleged “lack of projects,” which I experienced as a layoff. I also observed what appeared to be misuse of position by some leaders, including blurred professional boundaries, preferential treatment, and expectations that went beyond normal workplace roles—at times resembling personal-assistant-style demands rather than professional conduct. Surprisingly, I also noticed inconsistent “policies” applied differently to different individuals. In some cases, it felt like the rules changed depending on who you were. When leadership became aware that someone was related to another employee in the organization, it sometimes felt like that person was singled out or targeted rather than treated objectively. Overall, these practices—whether through inconsistent treatment, perceived power misuse, or favoritism—undermine trust, damage workplace culture, and raise serious concerns about fairness and professionalism.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All