Non competitive employer in a competitive arena - Software Engineer CGI Employee Review

2.0
Feb 25, 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

They contribute 10% to your pension if you put in 8% They ask you to work 37.5 hours, instead of the 40 some others do.

Cons

They would rather you resign than pay you competitive market rates to keep you. They will make you pay back costs of training if you leave. They delay and refuse to pay bonus payments, and take them back if you leave. The contract has excessive and unnecessary non compete clauses making it difficult to find work once leaving without them sending a team of lawyers after you. They have no interest in advancing your career. I guess that they can behave this way because there's an endless stream of graduates that will keep re-filling positions, giving little incentive to treat you as a long term asset to the company.

Explore other reviews about CGI

5.0
May 27, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good work environment Strong leadership

Cons

Room for growth can be limited unless you really seek it out.

1.0
Jun 16, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

no specific positives to highlight from my perspective

Cons

I worked at CGI in both India and the USA and observed similar workplace culture concerns across both locations. The only real difference was HR—India HR felt more supportive, while my experience with USA HR was disappointing. My employment ended shortly after maternity leave due to an alleged “lack of projects,” which I experienced as a layoff. I also observed what appeared to be misuse of position by some leaders, including blurred professional boundaries, preferential treatment, and expectations that went beyond normal workplace roles—at times resembling personal-assistant-style demands rather than professional conduct. Surprisingly, I also noticed inconsistent “policies” applied differently to different individuals. In some cases, it felt like the rules changed depending on who you were. When leadership became aware that someone was related to another employee in the organization, it sometimes felt like that person was singled out or targeted rather than treated objectively. Overall, these practices—whether through inconsistent treatment, perceived power misuse, or favoritism—undermine trust, damage workplace culture, and raise serious concerns about fairness and professionalism.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All