Bureaucratic, process driven and mediocre - Consultant CGI Employee Review

1.0
Jan 29, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The pension is good and the maternity benefits are good

Cons

Obsessed with hierarchy, process and vanity metrics. Processes are obscure and arcane and run by hard to use legacy systems. The quality of the staff reflects the fact the focus of the business is on low margin long term managed service. The ethos of the company is aligned to winning big managed service contracts and is poorly aligned to winning and running other delivery or consulting engagements CGI bought BJSS, claimed it was a merger and that they wanted to retain the best of BJSS and then didn't. Repeatedly claims to be focused on it's people in management communication, and yet it isn't - it's almost like they think if they keep saying it that it becomes true

Explore other reviews about CGI

5.0
Jun 18, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Work life balance, growth, quality

Cons

Less pay compared to market

1.0
Jun 16, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

no specific positives to highlight from my perspective

Cons

I worked at CGI in both India and the USA and observed similar workplace culture concerns across both locations. The only real difference was HR—India HR felt more supportive, while my experience with USA HR was disappointing. My employment ended shortly after maternity leave due to an alleged “lack of projects,” which I experienced as a layoff. I also observed what appeared to be misuse of position by some leaders, including blurred professional boundaries, preferential treatment, and expectations that went beyond normal workplace roles—at times resembling personal-assistant-style demands rather than professional conduct. Surprisingly, I also noticed inconsistent “policies” applied differently to different individuals. In some cases, it felt like the rules changed depending on who you were. When leadership became aware that someone was related to another employee in the organization, it sometimes felt like that person was singled out or targeted rather than treated objectively. Overall, these practices—whether through inconsistent treatment, perceived power misuse, or favoritism—undermine trust, damage workplace culture, and raise serious concerns about fairness and professionalism.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All