- Con la reclutadora: charla sobre mi experiencia, fue muy básica, ella no sabía sobre la diferencia entre UX Content, UX Design, es decir que era súper básica la info de la que podíamos hablar. - En la técnica: hablamos en inglés con la persona que estaba a cargo de proyectos. Me preguntó sobre la diferencia entre UX/UI. Sobre cómo defendería un proyecto a stakeholders y sobre cómo presentaría un proyecto. Fue de más o menos 30 minutos.
What's more important for a technical writer, the writer aspect or the technical aspect?
How do you plan to ensure that your focus is always on improving the customer experience?
"Tell me about a time when ..." ad infinitum.
The interviewers were managers of Sales hence asked only process related questions.
What types of writing have you done?
What do you want to be when you grow up?
Do you have any experience in technical writing?
To come up with psychology test material questions in the bizarre and mysterious parallel universe they seem to come up with them and measure their aptitude levels and quality standards. The steps themselves were poorly written-out and defined and explained, the product of some toxic internal politics ridden consensus perhaps, and the concepts - in the instructions, the materials, and even the 'model' example questions you were supposed to emulate, aspire to - were hopelessly and manifestly anachronistic. And ironically pompus of the type of pompous that's ignorant of what it's ignorant of, and yet acts superior for it.
What motivates you? What makes a good technical writer
Viewing 791 - 800 interview questions