I was invited to the technical test, it was a multiple choice test of 30 questions. There would be another programming test where you need to fix bugs and optimize given base code. After that there should be an actual interview which includes questions about soft skills and some technical stuff as well.

First test was on hacker rank where you're given to complete C++ related MCQs. Second stage involves fixing a pac man game written in C++ using SDL2. Final stage is with the programmers where you're asked questions about your background, the assignment and C++. I was rejected in the final stage. When asked for feedback, the Talent team came up with 2 reasons: a): Not enough positions (which is understandable) b): Positions were filled by people who reapplied from last year (some of which couldn't even complete the PAC man test). I was told that IF I reapplied next year, I would be given priority and wouldn't have to go through the process again. And guess what happened, when I reapplied again this year, the talent team now thinks that the process is unfair and wants me to go through the process again. (Yep, they still do the same PAC man tests). I can understand if a company struggles with management, but lying to graduates who apply with such passion is simply not an excuse. Wouldn't recommend Ubisoft's UK studios (Leamington spa and Newcastle upon Tyne).