I applied online. I interviewed at EPAM Systems in Apr 2026
Interview
Interview process was very good and smooth, communication from HR was prompt. 1st round is a coding assestment, and then two technical rounds followed by a client interview. Interviewers are very knowlegable and kind
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
Coding questions related to streams, merge sorted array, longest consecutive sequence and indepth questions related to jvm, gc, multithreading, concurrency, spring boot
I applied through a recruiter. I interviewed at EPAM Systems (Kyiv, ) in Jun 2024
Interview
First, you go through the company's interview process, which consists of three stages.
The first is a screening with a recruiter. The second is a technical interview. There's nothing special about the second stage — it's all very reasonable. Typically, you're asked a few theoretical questions from your stack and given a few tasks to solve.
The third stage is an interview with the managers of your local unit. Here it's enough to simply show interest and come across as a reasonable person. They'll also clarify the salary you're expecting to receive.
If they give you an offer and you accept it, then — as in my case — you'll be placed on the bench and will spend some time looking for a project. For me, this took about a month. There really are a lot of projects, so there's plenty to choose from. Project interviews are also a thing. From there, it depends on what you land: sometimes it's enough to just chat with the team, while other times they run several rounds of a full interview.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
SQL Excercise. Write a couple of intermediate queries
I applied through a recruiter. I interviewed at EPAM Systems (Pune) in May 2026
Interview
There are 3 rounds 1.coding assessment 2.Face2 Face techical round 3. Technomanager round very bad process dont apply for this organisation not given me proper feedback they are not hiring just did the candidates time waste ask candidates to come office and from morning to till evening they kept candidate to wait very bad process