employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Strategy&

Part of PwC

Is this your company?

Strategy& reviews

3.8

66% would recommend to a friend

(1,414 total reviews)

Leslie Moeller

64% approve of CEO

51% positive business outlook

Strategy& has an employee rating of 3.8 out of 5 stars, based on 1,414 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Strategy& employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Management et conseil aux entreprises industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

1K reviews
1.0
Oct 23, 2017

Avoid

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

You get a fancy name on your CV and a bunch of friends to share your misery with. You can have decent exit opportunities unless you want to exit consulting.

Cons

Work is very repetitive and not family friendly - especially when doing due diligence. You have a steep learning for 6 months and then nothing, except heavy workload. Engagement managers are told to do everything (managing projects, finding projects, mentor team members). VIPs in the organisation have unfortunately created a hostile environment and never had a reality check with HR for their management style. It goes from negative comments on dress code to clear threats that you will not be staffed unless you agree with partners' direction/project content. Coming out of MBA where debates and respect among students were mandatory, I got shocked by a sheep mentality and a certain bully culture that was tolerated in the firm. HR could not provide any help, "it has always been this way, and current partners learned it from previous partners" was their only response. The limited recruitment pool in London (MBA & Oxbridge) is certainly not helping.

2.0
Jul 6, 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Competitive pay and genuinely nice ex-Booz people, although most are jumping ship.

Cons

- Strategy& recruits from the best Grad schools and then fires it's Senior Associates 8 months in because of 'utilization'. This happened in FY 2016 and FY 2015. - This firm claims to invest in coaching & development of its talent but you can expect to remain unstaffed because Managers & Directors would rather staff someone with experience. - The ever present threat (sometimes through the year) of getting fired coupled with a weak pipeline of projects leads to a toxic culture. Also utilization is a metric only in your performance, so no one is really incentivized to get you staffed.

2.0
Jun 2, 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

At its best (which is a hit or miss occurrence sadly), I do believe that Strategy& gives employees an experience on par with any of the top strategy houses. This includes: - Exposure to top-level executives and Board members - Challenging, analytically intensive work -Rapid acquisition of new skills and advancement through the ranks The compensation package is solid and the Firm has a respectable client base. Some of the legacy Booz Partners who remain are legends in their own right and world-renowned strategists. If you're lucky enough to have one of them take you under their wings, you will have a materially improved experience than many of your colleagues.

Cons

Numerous, unfortunately: -Ironic for a strategy house that does operating model design work, we still seem to have not quite figured out the integration with PwC. We claim to be a separate brand and yet even senior-leader Partners only use "PwC" brand in front of clients. Clients are, not surprisingly, balking at paying former Booz rates for what they perceive as a fully integrated PwC talent pool, causing our Partners to aggressively understaff projects to hit their margin targets (read: don't expect to have any modicum of a personal life when staffed on projects, not even on most weekends. 8 AM to 2 AM days back-to-back are not uncommon.) -Alignment into industry verticals (a horrible PwC structure) forces junior professionals to "choose a major" too early; this also inhibits cross-staffing of talent leading to some of the severe bench issues (see below) - Currently there is a major misalignment between our resource bench and the pipeline due to flagrantly negligent overhiring at the campus level last year. This is leading to many resources - particularly newly hired ones at the Associate and Senior Associate level - sitting on the beach without work for months at a time -PwC is just wrapping up a major internal re-org which seems to have overlapped with the performance management season. As a result, few folks feel any job security at the moment. People are being fired left and right, and the rumor mill is rich with tales of pending mass layoffs. Some junior folks have recently been fired within their first 7-8 months of joining the Firm for low utilization - a metric over which they have zero effective control -We seem to lack a robust mentorship culture, and this becomes most apparent at the Manager level. Many of our Managers were beaten to become highly effective Senior Associates - i.e., they're great at pumping out slides - but never trained on the basics of how to manage. Never in my career have I dealt with a collective pool of managers with such low emotional intelligence and no clue as to how to build a highly effective team. -The annual performance evaluation process is opaque; some people literally don't know if they will be promoted or counseled out until they get an email from HR - Training - particularly new hire training - is wholly insufficient in terms of preparing you to carry out the basic tasks of the role

Viewing 43 - 45 of 1,414 Reviews

Glassdoor has 1,910 Strategy& reviews submitted anonymously by Strategy& employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Strategy& is right for you.